I just read this article: https://www.astro.com/astrology/in_rgdegrees_e.htm
This is not a new topic for me. In 2020, based on my intuition, I wrote a post on Twitter about the “age of the planet,” suggesting that the decanate of a planetary position indicates the state of maturity of our planet, and consequently that of the characters we associate with it. That was my attempt of making a theory, but the one presented by Ray Grasse in the aforementioned article is, in all its logic, “simply” spectacular. I say this because, when reviewing my chart and thinking back, it makes a lot of sense—even with asteroids!—although I don't find the same level of correlation in the charts of acquaintances, perhaps because I don't know those stories in detail.
The premise of this theory can be understood in several ways. For example: that our life, whatever its length, is 30° traveled several times, degree 0°-1° = 1 year of age, and so subsequently, upon reaching 29°59”59’ we begin again. So, since we have planets throughout those 30°, at some age we will have an experience of that planet's nature. The details are provided by the planet's sign and house.
In my case I have the planets, nodes and some significant asteroids distributed between the 4th and 26th. I'm excited to know that I should have a solar experience (man) between the ages of 55 and 57, but also very disheartened to know what that might mean!
Let's look at some initial observations: